ONLINE VS ONSITE HAZOP

 

ONLINE VS ONSITE HAZOP

 

The one question in these times of COVID19 that had never been asked in the EHS industry and has suddenly pushed its way to the top in barely 18 months of existence faster than Elon Musk has pushed it in the list of richest men on earth is – ‘Should I go for an Online HAZOP or stick to the good old On-Site HAZOP’?

We try to list the factors influencing the choice and help you select what is right for you.

 

1.       COVID 19 Pandemic vs Safety

It can not be neglected that the country and the world over are facing unforeseen circumstances and any travel or commute aiding the contagion should be discouraged. It is one of the most important factor in deciding the selection of method of HAZOP. On site HAZOP requires the chairman and scribe plus the involvement team members to travel to site of sessions. This exposes them to higher risk of communication of virus and others coming in contact with them post travel.

2.       Use of Technology

There are many video-conferencing platforms available with easy-to-use interface. Yet, may among our learned plant personnels have a hard time using the online tools. Internet connectivity, background noise and etiquettes of interference in conversation are also some of the issues faced by HAZOP chairmen in effectively conducting the sessions.

3.       Current status of Workforce

While most industries can and are operating in approx. 100% WFH mode, the chemical/API/Pharma/Oil&Gas/Similar manufacturing industries do not have this leverage. To keep the disease spread rate low and production running, many companies are using an optimised number of workforce on site effectively reducing the number of personnel in given shifts. Thus increasing the workload on each individual as well. A risk assessment session which earlier could have been attended with 100% availability by obligating own responsibilities to a fellow worker may now require planning of availability in advance. In our experience, many a times important individuals have failed to attend a pre-planned session due to sudden increased workload and relevant open/discussion points had to be parked awaiting the next availability of same individual. This involves both management and plant personnel.

4.       TIMELINES

While the convenience of remote HAZOP can not be argued, it is a hard fact that onsite HAZOP is very efficient time-wise compared to online HAZOP.

The focus of team i.e. mainly operations, design, instrumentation, maintenance, electrical and EHS participating in the HAZOP when participating online is distributed due to physical absence of chairman and when not actively taking part in discussion, the team members tend to get distracted.

In Indsafe’s experience of many HAZOPs conducted online, a typical pharma/API/Chemical unit operation node will take twice as much time compared to onsite HAZOP.

5.       Workforce Involvement/Chairman’s effectiveness

If it was up to the HAZOP chairman (refering the data of survey among our in house team and consultants), the method of choice will be ONSITE HAZOP owing to multi-fold increase in active involvement of HAZOP team due to their physical presence. This allows the chairman to disrupt negative conversation better, control direction of conversation, demand inputs from specific individual, etc. in a more effective way. Humans are naturally trained in inter personnel skills during conversations and this is something that is leveraged by HAZOP Chairman naturally. This is also a skill that professionals across the world are still struggling to utilise when working with teams online.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Image
  The Expensive overdose of ATEX equipment in Indian Industry Blog 2  Tags - ATEX, HAC, Area Classification, Temperature Class, Procurement Author - Naveen Saini Hazardous area classification is pretty much the new norm of safety in Indian Industry.  At least the ones on leaderboard in cash making and the ones with most visible branding have this inevitable responsibility of dragging the lesser aware with them to a better, safer culture by bringing new things to safety. HAC (or ATEX) compliant equipment have multiple selection criteria that directly effect the cost of equipment.  This article is going to cover T-Class selection and the free run vendors are having because of lack of awareness from procurement and maintenance teams around the industry.  T class selection is made against the AIT (Auto-Ignition Temperature) of a flammable chemical and is not to be confused with Flash point.  For layman reference, AIT is many times higher than flash point. (For ...
Read more
  Hi Welcome to Indsafe Blogpage  Find us at www.indsafe.in THE DILEMMA OF SANITIZERS  So the Indian Industry. much like everyone was rocked by Covid-19, in ways more than imaginable.  To top it all, there was a sudden rush (and push) to manufacture sanitizers to meet (and handle) the massive demand of the time.  The government and local bodies (supported by the government) were so fast footed to distribute licenses for storing Class A flammables and Indian FMCG were equally eager to showcase (and profit from) their low cost manufacturing capabilities at large scale and readily accessible large distribution networks across the country. In the midst of it all, everyone forgot to give the necessary due diligence to transport, handling and storage of raw material used in sanitizers - 99% PURE ALCOHOLS with extremely low flash points, minimum ignition energy, extremely low tolerance to static discharges, high range of flammability and explosivity, potential of creat...
Read more